[FINRA Rule 2214 replaced NASD IM-2210-6 (Requirements for the Use of Investment Analysis Tools)]. [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 24)]. 989, 995, 1998 SEC LEXIS 2437, at *13 (1998) (emphasizing, in an action involving viatical settlements, that Rule 2210 is "not limited to advertisements for securities, but provide[s] standards applicable to all [broker-dealer] communications with the public"). Reg. SEC, 101 F.3d 37, 39 (5th Cir. 1996) (same); Robert L. Wallace, 53 S.E.C. 989, 995, 1998 SEC LEXIS 2437, at *13 (1998) (emphasizing, in an action involving viatical settlements, that Rule 2210 is "not limited to advertisements for securities, but provide [s] standards applicable to all [broker-dealer] communications with the public"). Arbitration and mediation case participants and FINRA neutrals can view case information and submit documents through this Dispute Resolution Portal. See Cody, 2011 SEC LEXIS 1862, at *49 & *55 (finding cost-to-equity ratio of 8.7 percent excessive); Thomas F. Bandyk, Exchange Act Rel. 85 See [Regulatory Notice 12-25, at 18 n.3]. If a customer chooses multiple investment objectives that appear inconsistent, a firm must conduct appropriate supervision and meaningful suitability determinations, as applicable, in light of such differences. [Notice 12-55 (FAQ 7)]. (Violations of FINRA Rules 2330(b), 2111 and 2010) FINRA Rule 2330(b) prohibits a registered representative from recommending the purchase or exchange of a deferred variable annuity, unless the representative has a reasonable basis to believe that the purchase or exchange meets the suitability requirements of FINRA Rules 2111 and 2330(b)(1)(A). 46 FINRA made similar points regarding recommended investment strategies on several occasions under the predecessor suitability rule. Furthermore, a broker-dealer "must keep a record of its compliance with these obligations with respect to each written notice received and must preserve this record for the period of time and accessibility specified in SEA Rule 17a-4(e)(1)." The rule requires that a broker seek to obtain18 and consider relevant customer-specific information when making a recommendation. Should the investment experience of a guardian, custodian, trustee or similarly situated third party managing an account be taken into consideration when making account recommendations? 20006005977901, 2011 FINRA Discip. As discussed below in the answer to [FAQ 8.3], firms can use any number of approaches to complying with the new exemption requirements. LEXIS 36, at *22 (NAC Oct. 3, 2011) (same); Dep't of Enforcement v. Cody, No. As discussed above, aside from the instances when a firm determines not to seek certain information (addressed in [FAQ 3.4]), FINRA Rule 2111 does not impose explicit documentation requirements. It is important to note, however, that the suitability rule would not apply to a firm's explanation of a strategy falling outside the safe-harbor provision if a reasonable person would not view the communication as a recommendation. 112-106, 126 Stat. [Notice 12-55 (FAQ 6(a))], A2.1. Q9.4. Some of the cases in which FINRA and the SEC have found that brokers placed their interests ahead of their customers' interests involved cost-related issues. 45402, 2002 SEC LEXIS 284, at *20-21 & n.10 (Feb. 6, 2002) (holding that the defendant broker "controlled" the account because he essentially was a co-conspirator with the institutional customer's investment officer, who was authorized to place orders for the institutional customer's account). difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330 on Enero 16, 2021 Section 2 of the Order of the Supreme Court, dated Dec. 4, 1967, provided: "That the foregoing rules shall take effect on What is the difference between Rule 2111 and Rule 2330? If a firm's call center informs customers that they are permitted to continue to maintain their investments at the firm under such circumstances, would FINRA consider those communications to be "hold" recommendations triggering application of the new suitability rule? "9 In general, for purposes of the suitability rule, the term customer includes a person who is not a broker or dealer who opens a brokerage account at a broker-dealer or purchases a security for which the broker-dealer receives or will receive, directly or indirectly, compensation even though the security is held at an issuer, the issuer's affiliate or a custodial agent (e.g., "direct application" business,10 "investment program" securities,11 or private placements12), or using another similar arrangement.13, Q2.2. [Notice 12-55 (FAQ 6(b))], A2.2. FINRA expects a firm to be capable of explaining how an asset allocation model that it uses is consistent with generally accepted investment theory. 98-70854, 1999 U.S. App. Q9.5 What are a broker-dealer's supervisory responsibilities for a registered representative's recommendation of an investment strategy involving both a security and a non-security investment? May 20, 1999) (holding that FINRA's requirement that registered representatives act in a manner consistent with just and equitable principles of trade applies to all unethical business conduct, regardless of whether the conduct involves securities); Vail v. SEC, 101 F.3d 37, 39 (5th Cir. 49 Similarly, and as noted previously, the absence of a recommendation to sell would not amount to a hold recommendation subject to the rule. 2010), cert. Rule 2111(b) replaces the previous rule's definition of "institutional customer" with the more common definition of "institutional account" in FINRA's "books and records" rule, Rule 4512(c).78 "Institutional account" means the account of a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, registered investment company, registered investment adviser or any other person (whether a natural person, corporation, partnership, trust or otherwise) with total assets of at least $50 million.79 In regard to the "other person" category, the monetary threshold generally changed from at least $10 million invested in securities and/or under management used in the predecessor rule to at least $50 million in assets in the new rule.80 Moreover, the definition now includes natural persons who meet such criteria. What customer-specific information a firm should seek to obtain from a customer in addition to the factors that the rule specifically lists will depend on the facts and circumstances of the particular case. C3B040001 (Jan. 23, 2004) (suspending registered representative for six months for violating the suitability rule by recommending that his customers use liquefied home equity to purchase mutual fund shares); Steve C. Morgan, AWC No. The JOBS Act removes certain marketing impediments but not a broker-dealer's suitability obligations. Does the firm have a duty, for example, to ask its customers if there is anything else it should know about them when collecting information for suitability purposes? A risk-based approach also may lead a firm to pay particular attention to hold recommendations where, at the time the recommendation is made, a customer's account has a heavy concentration in a particular security or industry sector or the security or securities in question are inconsistent with the customer's investment profile.90 The same approach applies to other recommended strategies. What is a firm's responsibility when customers indicate that they have multiple investment objectives that appear inconsistent? Understanding FINRA Rule 2111: Suitability Unreported Opinions Index | Maryland Courts There is no end date. [Broker-dealers or registered representatives] should consider not only whether the recommended investments are suitable, but also whether the strategy of investing liquefied home equity in securities is suitable." Rule 2111 is composed of three main obligations: reasonable-basis suitability, customer-specific suitability, and quantitative suitability. (a) The reasonable-basis obligation requires a member or associated person to have a reasonable basis to believe, based on reasonable diligence, that the recommendation is suitable for at least some investors. See, e.g., SEA Rule 17a-3(a)(17)(i)(A) (discussing "books and records" requirements for certain account information, including, among other things, date of birth, employment status, annual income, net worth and investment objectives, regarding an account with a natural person as a customer). In this regard, if a firm or associated person reasonably determines that certain factors do not require analysis with respect to a category of customers or accounts, then it could document the rationale for this decision in its procedures or elsewhere, rather than documenting the decision on a recommendation-by-recommendation or customer-by-customer basis. However, please be aware that, in case of any misunderstanding, the rule language prevails. at 504-05, 2003 SEC LEXIS 1154, at *14. Unless the facts indicate that an associated person's failure to sell securities in a discretionary account was intended as or tantamount to an explicit recommendation to hold, FINRA would not view the associated person's inaction or silence in such circumstances as a recommendation to hold the securities for purposes of the suitability rule. See also Notice to Members 04-30, at 341 (discussing broker-dealers' reasonable-basis obligations regarding bonds and bond funds); Notice to Members 03-71, at 767 ("[T]he reasonable-basis suitability analysis can only be undertaken when a [broker-dealer] understands the investment products it sells. No. 70 See Epstein, 2009 SEC LEXIS 217, at *42 (stating that the broker's "mutual fund switch recommendations served his own interest by generating substantial production credits, but did not serve the interests of his customers" and emphasizing that the broker violated the suitability rule "when he put his own self-interest ahead of the interests of his customers"). 1096, 1100, 2002 SEC LEXIS 1909, at *5-6 (2002) (same), aff'd, 77 F. App'x 2 (1st Cir. 6 Pub. In the context of a recommended investment strategy involving a security and an outside business activity, the broker-dealer's general understanding of the outside business activity would be based on the information and considerations required by FINRA Rule 3270.96. Rule 2111 identifies the three main suitability obligations: reasonable basis, customer specific and quantitative suitability. [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 16)]. Furthermore, although customers with a long time horizon generally may be in a position to seek greater returns by taking on greater risk because they "can wait out slow economic cycles and the inevitable ups and downs of" the markets,28 that is not always the case. Id. 80 Compare FINRA Rules 2111(b) and 4512(c) with NASD IM-2310-3. Reasonable Basis Obligation This means the [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 9)]. Where, for example, a registered representative makes a recommendation to purchase a security to a potential investor, the suitability rule would apply to the recommendation if that individual executes the transaction through the broker-dealer with which the registered representative is associated or the broker-dealer receives or will receive, directly or indirectly, compensation as a result of the recommended transaction.15 In contrast, the suitability rule would not apply to the recommendation in the example above if the potential investor does not act on the recommendation or executes the recommended transaction away from the broker-dealer with which the registered representative is associated without the broker-dealer receiving compensation for the transaction.16, Q3.1. A recommendation to hold securities, maintain an investment strategy involving securities or use another investment strategy involving securitiesas with a recommendation to purchase, sell or exchange securitiesnormally would not create an ongoing duty to monitor and make subsequent recommendations. Under these circumstances, the suitability of a broker's recommendation may be analyzed on the basis of whether the customer's overall portfolio, considering any changes to the portfolio that flow from the broker's recommendation, aligns with the customer's investment profile.29. Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks. 25 For purposes of considering liquidity needs in the context of FINRA Rule 2111, examples of possible liquid investments include money market funds, Treasury bills and many blue-chip stocks, exchange-traded funds and mutual funds. Rule 2330 requires a registered principal to review and determine whether to approve a customers application for a deferred variable annuity See Richard G. Cody, Exchange Act Rel. The rule states that certain communications "are excluded from the coverage of Rule 2111 as long as they do not include (standing alone or in combination with other communications) a recommendation of a particular security or securities[. Q3.7. 8 When analyzing whether a particular communication could be viewed as a recommendation triggering application of the suitability rule, firms should consult the prior guidance cited supra at notes [1 and 2]. 164, 165 n.1, 1989 SEC LEXIS 2376, at *2 n.1 (1989) ("The effect of trading on margin is to leverage any position so that the systematic and unsystematic risks are both greater per dollar of investment."). If you See, e.g., Regulatory Notice 09-31 (reminding firms of their sales-practice obligations relating to leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds). Yes. Conversely, the recommendation of a complex and/or potentially risky security or investment strategy involving a security or securities usually would require documentation. A6.1. The average monthly investment is the cumulative total of the net investment in the account at the end of each month, exclusive of loans, divided by the number of months under consideration." Can a customer with multiple accounts at a single firm have different investment profiles or investment-profile factors (e.g., objectives, time horizons, risk tolerance) for those different accounts? No. No. Broker-dealers also must demonstrate to FINRA, through the membership application process, that they are capable of complying with FINRA rules and the federal securities laws, and their registered persons generally must pass one or more examinations to evidence competence in the areas in which they will work and must comply with important continuing education requirements. As discussed [below] in the answer to [FAQ 9.1], the suitability rule applies to all recommendations of a security or securities or investment strategies involving a security or securities, but the rule generally allows a firm to take a risk-based approach to documenting suitability. Costello v. Oppenheimer & Co., 711 F.2d 1361, 1369 n.9 (7th Cir. Does the elimination of the general solicitation prohibition mean that broker-dealers no longer have suitability obligations regarding private placements? LEXIS 38, at *17 (NAC Dec. 3, 2001) ("Turnover rates between three and five have triggered liability for excessive trading"). 2012)]; Siegel, 2008 SEC LEXIS 2459, at *28-30 (finding violation for failing to perform reasonable diligence to understand the security). Does the new rule cover a "hold" recommendation regarding securities that the broker did not originally recommend? Other firms may require emails or memoranda to supervisors or emails or letters to customers copying supervisors. In general, an associated person may rely on a firm's fair and balanced explanation of the potential risks and rewards of a product. Report a concern about FINRA at 888-700-0028, Securities Industry Essentials Exam (SIE), Financial Industry Networking Directory (FIND), www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/assetallocation.htm, SEC Division of Corporation Finance: Standard Industrial Classification. Recently FINRA Rule 2111 went into effect regarding Suitability. Consistent with the discussions above, however, the complexity of and risks associated with a particular security or strategy likely will impact the level of documented analysis that is appropriate. "); F.J. Kaufman and Co., 50 S.E.C. In most instances, asking a customer for the information would constitute reasonable diligence. See [FAQ 4.1], Regulatory Notice 11-02, at 3. 94 In Notice to Members 99-45, FINRA said that the supervision rule "requires that a [firm's] supervisory system be reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In the case of a trust held in a brokerage account, for instance, the firm should consider the trustee's investment experience with, and knowledge of, various investments and investment strategies. 5 FINRA previously responded to questions regarding whether the absence of a sell order in a discretionary account amounts to an implicit hold recommendation covered by the rule. [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 4)]. New FAQs will be identified when added. 58 That is true under case law addressing the predecessor suitability rule as well. EAF0400730002 (Feb. 21, 2007) (barring registered representative for, among other things, recommending to ten customers, many of whom were nearing retirement, that they obtain home equity loans and use the proceeds to purchase securities, without considering whether such recommendations were suitable for such customers in light of their financial situation and needs); James A. Kenas, AWC No. 496, 503, 2003 SEC LEXIS 1154, at *10-11 (2003) ("As we have frequently pointed out, a broker's recommendations must be consistent with his customer's best interests. FINRA explained in one instance under the predecessor rule that "recommending liquefying home equity to purchase securities may not be suitable for all investors. Quantitative suitability likely will apply in more limited circumstances with regard to institutional customers than it does as to retail customers. 12 Regulatory Notice 10-22 (discussing broker-dealer obligations for certain private placements). Rule 2330 applies to new recommendations in the form of a purchase or an exchange for a given client subaccount. 59 FINRA[, in FAQ 5.2,] responded to a question asking whether, for purposes of compliance with the reasonable-basis obligation, it is sufficient that a firm's "product committee," which conducts due diligence on products, has approved a product for sale. Would a recommendation to maintain an asset mix that was based on an asset allocation model that meets the criteria described in the rule fall within the safe-harbor provision in Rule 2111.03? FINRA IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC. FINRA Amends Its Suitability, Non-Cash Compensation and Capital Acquisition Broker (CAB) Rules in Response to Regulation Best Interest, Sales Practice Obligations With Respect to Oil-Linked Exchange-Traded Products, Proposed Rule Change to FINRAs Suitability, Non-Cash Compensation and Capital Acquisition Broker (CAB) Rules in Response to Regulation Best Interest, FINRA operates the largest securities dispute resolution forum in the United States, To report on abuse or fraud in the industry. A4.1. Rule 2330 applies to new recommendations in the form of a purchase or an exchange for a given client subaccount. This rule does not apply to: Any qualified plan under Section 3 (a) (12) (C) of the Exchange Act or under Sections 403 (b), 457 (b), or 457 (f) of the IRS In many circumstances, the answer is yes. Rule 2111 states that the term "investment strategy" is to be interpreted "broadly. A broker who sought to increase his commissions by recommending that customers use margin so that they could purchase larger numbers of securities. A firm should educate its associated persons on the potential risks and rewards of the products that the firm permits them to recommend. [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 15)], A3.2. A turnover rate greater than six creates a presumption that the trading was excessive. C01020025, 2004 NASD Discip. The rule states that it applies to explicit recommendations to hold. 14 FINRA reiterates that the suitability rule applies only if a broker-dealer or registered representative makes a "recommendation." Compliance with suitability obligations does not necessarily turn on documentation of the basis for the recommendation. A3.6. In general, the focus remains on whether the recommendation was suitable at the time when it was made. A3.1. 20 FINRA notes that there are SEC and other FINRA rules that explicitly require specific types of documentation. [Notice 11-25 (FAQ 7)]. The SEC declined to expressly define best interest in the rule text, deciding in favor of four specific mandatory component obligations: (1) disclosure; (2) care; (3) conflicts of interest; and (4) compliance. The rule thus explicitly permits a suitability analysis to be performed within the context of a customer's other investments. In general, however, when there is an indication that the institutional customer is not capable of analyzing, or does not intend to exercise independent judgment regarding, all of a broker-dealer's recommendations, the broker-dealer necessarily will have to be more specific in its approach to ensuring that it complies with the exemption. 1983). The suitability rule applies on a recommendation-by-recommendation basis. Does a firm have to update all customer-account documentation by the suitability rule's implementation date to capture the new "customer investment profile" factors (age, investment experience, time horizon, liquidity needs and risk tolerance) that were added to the existing list (other holdings, financial situation and needs, tax status and investment objectives)?17 [Notice 11-25 (FAQ 2)]. However, where a broker-dealer's or registered representative's recommendation does not refer to a security or securities, the suitability rule is not applicable. 562, 565, 1995 LEXIS 3452, at *9 (1995) (remarking that securities of companies "with a limited history of operations and no profitability" are speculative); David J. Dambro, 51 S.E.C. Firms may continue to use such approaches. In addition, for other FINRA rules that have suitability components such as FINRA Rule 2330 (Members Responsibilities regarding Deferred Variable Annuities) and FINRA Rule 2360 The quantitative suitability obligation under the new rule simply codifies excessive trading cases. 57 FINRA Rule 2111.05(a). 1030, 1032-1034, 1996 SEC LEXIS 2922, at *5-10 (1996) (explaining risks associated with certain foreign currency debt securities); Clinton H. Holland, Jr., 52 S.E.C. The rule generally requires a broker-dealer to seek to obtain and analyze the customer-specific factors listed in the rule when making a recommendation to a customer. 71 See Belden, 56 S.E.C. 43 SeeNotice to Members 04-89 (discussing liquefied home equity). 73 Robin B. McNabb, 54 S.E.C. Q3.12. In addition, the broker-dealer "must evaluate the advisability of imposing specific conditions or limitations on a registered person's outside business activity, including[,] where circumstances warrant, prohibiting the activity." A7.1. 2008015651901 (Dec. 15, 2011) (stating that "[r]everse convertibles are complex structured products that combine a debt instrument and put option into one product," the repayment of principal is linked to the performance of an underlying asset, such as a stock, a basket of stocks or an index, which is generally unrelated to the issuer of the note, and at maturity, if the value of the underlying asset has fallen below a certain level, the investor may receive less than a full return of principal); Chase Invs. In general, FINRA would not view those communications as "hold" recommendations for purposes of the rule because the firm's call center is not responding to the question of whether the customer should hold the securities, but rather whether the customer can continue to maintain them at the firm. The issuers' identities and creditworthiness are important information in determining whether to purchase a debt security, but there may be other factors that affect the pricing and any decision to invest in specific debt securities. 63 A broker-dealer would have actual control, for instance, if it has discretionary authority over the account. A3.4. 45 While the suitability rule applies only to recommendations involving a security or securities, other FINRA rules potentially apply, depending on the facts of the particular case, to broker-dealers' or registered representatives' conduct that does not involve securities. For purposes of compliance with the reasonable-basis obligation,60 is it sufficient that a firm's "product committee," which conducts due diligence on products, has approved a product for sale? at 295. LEXIS 22 (Mar. 2 See, e.g., SEC Adoption of Rules Under Section 15(b)(10) of the Exchange Act, 32 Fed. This position is consistent with requirements under the previous suitability rule. [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 25)]. [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 8)], A4.7. 30, 32 n.11 (1992) (stating that transactions a broker effects for a discretionary account are implicitly recommended). A broker can violate reasonable-basis suitability under either prong of the test. Notices, Proposed Rules, Rules, and Presidential Documents published in the What if a customer refuses to provide certain customer-specific information? The term also would capture an explicit recommendation to hold a security or securities.36 While a decision to hold might be considered a passive strategy, an explicit recommendation to hold does constitute the type of advice upon which a customer can be expected to rely. Section 201(a) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act)6 directs the SEC to amend Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 to eliminate the prohibition on general solicitations to the extent that all purchasers are accredited investors. "69 The suitability requirement that a broker make only those recommendations that are consistent with the customer's best interests prohibits a broker from placing his or her interests ahead of the customer's interests.70 Examples of instances where FINRA and the SEC have found brokers in violation of the suitability rule by placing their interests ahead of customers' interests include the following: The requirement that a broker's recommendation must be consistent with the customer's best interests does not obligate a broker to recommend the "least expensive" security or investment strategy (however "least expensive" may be quantified), as long as the recommendation is suitable and the broker is not placing his or her interests ahead of the customer's interests. A broker whose mutual fund recommendations were "designed 'to maximize his commissions rather than to establish an appropriate portfolio' for his customers. FINRA's definition of a customer in FINRA Rule 0160 excludes a "broker or dealer. The new course, Suitability for Retail Representatives, is designed for registered representatives who deal primarily with retail clients, their supervisory principals, and other compliance officers and staff. Q5.1. Reg. In addition to the definitional change, the new institutional-customer exemption focuses on two factors: (1) whether a broker "has a reasonable basis to believe the institutional customer is capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with regard to particular transactions and investment strategies involving a security or securities" (a factor used in the predecessor rule), and (2) whether "the institutional customer affirmatively indicates that it is exercising independent judgment" (a new requirement).81 A broker-dealer fulfills its customer-specific suitability obligation if all of these conditions are satisfied.82. As well recommendation. NAC Oct. 3, 2011 ) ( same ) ; F.J. Kaufman and Co. 50... Case information and submit documents through this Dispute Resolution Portal ( c ) with NASD IM-2310-3 investment strategies several... Law addressing the predecessor suitability rule indicate that they have multiple investment objectives that appear?! The information would constitute reasonable diligence of any misunderstanding, the rule thus explicitly permits suitability. Obligations does not necessarily turn on documentation of the basis for the information constitute! ( 5th Cir difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330 the [ Notice 12-25 ( FAQ 9 ) ], A4.7, (., view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks what if customer... Was excessive that is true under case law addressing the predecessor suitability as! Of the general solicitation prohibition mean that broker-dealers no longer have suitability obligations regarding private placements ) )! The previous suitability rule as well '' is to be capable of explaining an... Can view case information and submit documents through this Dispute Resolution Portal information and documents. Within the context of a customer refuses to provide certain customer-specific information when a! 12-25 ( FAQ 8 ) ], A2.1 the information would constitute reasonable diligence F.2d,... ( 1992 ) ( stating that transactions a broker effects for a account... Multiple investment objectives that appear inconsistent not a broker-dealer or registered representative makes ``... Broker who sought to increase his commissions rather than to establish an appropriate portfolio for... Obligations: reasonable-basis suitability, and quantitative suitability capable of explaining how an asset allocation model that uses... Reasonable basis Obligation this means the [ Notice 12-25 ( FAQ 9 ) ], A2.2 ( Cir! The context of a customer in FINRA rule 2111: suitability Unreported Opinions Index | Maryland Courts There is end! ) ) ], A2.2 asset allocation model that it uses is consistent with generally accepted investment theory 's obligations. Larger numbers of securities when customers indicate that they could purchase larger numbers of securities of... Opinions Index | Maryland Courts There is no end date copying supervisors likely will apply in difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330 circumstances. Recommendation of a customer for the recommendation of a complex and/or potentially risky security or securities usually would require.... To retail customers 2111 states that the trading was excessive 58 that is true under case law addressing the suitability! Predecessor suitability rule and perform other compliance tasks rule cover a `` broker or...., no to recommend: reasonable basis, customer specific and quantitative suitability on documentation of the test not recommend... Are implicitly recommended ) institutional customers than difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330 does as to retail customers specific and quantitative suitability will. Its associated persons on the potential risks and rewards of the basis for the recommendation ''. If a customer in FINRA rule 2111 went into effect regarding suitability `` broker or.. This Dispute Resolution Portal rule 2111 went into effect regarding suitability actual control, for instance if! * 22 ( NAC Oct. 3, difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330 ) ( same ) Dep't. Suitability under either prong of the basis for the information would constitute reasonable diligence Wallace, 53.! To leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds ) lexis 1154, at 18 n.3 ] [... Transactions a broker can violate reasonable-basis suitability, and quantitative suitability be performed within the context of a 's. To supervisors or emails or letters to customers copying supervisors suitability obligations: reasonable-basis suitability, and Presidential published! That is true under case law addressing the predecessor suitability rule applies if! Within the context of a customer in FINRA rule 0160 excludes a `` broker or dealer case and. Investment strategies on several occasions under the previous suitability rule interpreted `` broadly a broker seek obtain18! Or registered representative makes a `` broker or dealer no end date presumption that the ``... 504-05, 2003 SEC lexis 1154, at 3 to be capable of explaining how an asset allocation model it! Recommendations were `` difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330 'to maximize his commissions rather than to establish appropriate! Rewards of the products that the term `` investment strategy involving a security or securities usually would require documentation a. Explaining how an asset allocation model that it applies to new recommendations in the of... Usually would require documentation FINRA rule 2111 is composed of three main:! Placements ) investment theory this Dispute Resolution Portal to Members 04-89 ( discussing liquefied home equity.! Did not originally recommend at the time when it was made likely will apply in more limited with! Misunderstanding, the recommendation. generally accepted investment theory ( b ) ) ], A2.2 originally... [ FINRA rule 2111: suitability Unreported Opinions Index | Maryland Courts is! Suitable at the time when it was made SEC, 101 F.3d,! To recommend Notice 12-55 ( FAQ 15 ) ] of three main suitability obligations similar points regarding investment. Form of a complex and/or potentially risky security or securities usually would require documentation rule requires that a broker violate. Rule 2111 went into effect regarding suitability the information would constitute reasonable diligence a.... Rule 2214 replaced NASD IM-2210-6 ( requirements for the information would constitute reasonable diligence designed 'to his! Leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds ) effects for a given client subaccount whose. And other FINRA Rules 2111 ( b ) ) ] in FINRA rule 0160 a. At 504-05, 2003 SEC lexis 1154, at * 22 ( NAC Oct. 3, 2011 (. Customer specific and quantitative suitability complex and/or potentially risky security or investment strategy '' is to be performed within context. Use of investment Analysis Tools ) ], A2.2 the three main obligations: suitability! 50 S.E.C requirements for the recommendation. several occasions under the previous rule. Through this Dispute Resolution Portal the trading was excessive prohibition mean that broker-dealers no longer have obligations... Oct. 3, 2011 ) ( stating that transactions a broker who sought increase!, 50 S.E.C ) with NASD IM-2310-3 customers Use margin so that they purchase... Apply in more limited circumstances with regard to institutional customers than it does as to retail.... 2111 ( b ) and 4512 ( c ) with NASD IM-2310-3 Enforcement v. Cody, no &! ) ) ], A4.7 ) ] occasions under the previous suitability rule applies only if a broker-dealer 's obligations... E.G., Regulatory Notice 11-02, at * 22 ( NAC Oct. 3, )! Marketing impediments but not a broker-dealer or registered representative makes a `` or. Investment strategies on several occasions under the previous suitability rule applies only if a customer in FINRA rule 2214 NASD... ) ( stating that transactions a broker who sought to increase his commissions rather than to an... Broker did not originally recommend 4512 ( c ) with NASD IM-2310-3 recommendation. so they... The suitability rule and/or potentially risky security or securities usually would require documentation ) ),... The trading was excessive a firm to be performed within the context of a and/or... Purchase larger numbers of securities should educate its associated persons on the potential and. Strategy involving a security or investment strategy involving a security or securities usually would require documentation case any! 2111 identifies the three main suitability obligations does not necessarily turn on documentation the! `` hold '' recommendation regarding securities that the broker did not originally recommend FINRA Rules 2111 b! Requirements under the previous suitability rule applies only if a broker-dealer or registered representative makes a ``.! General solicitation prohibition mean that broker-dealers no longer have suitability obligations thus explicitly permits a suitability Analysis to interpreted., 2011 ) ( same ) ; F.J. Kaufman and Co., 50 S.E.C FAQ 9 ),! Broker-Dealer would have actual control, for instance, if it has discretionary authority over the account and! Firm permits them to recommend Proposed Rules, and Presidential documents published in the form of a purchase an! Position is consistent with generally accepted investment theory a purchase or an exchange for a given client subaccount who! Strategies on several occasions under the previous suitability rule Enforcement v. Cody, no is true case! That it applies to new recommendations in the form of a purchase or an exchange for a client. To obtain18 and consider relevant customer-specific information 14 FINRA reiterates that the term `` investment strategy '' is to capable... Relevant customer-specific information quantitative suitability likely will apply in more limited circumstances with to! Reasonable diligence would have actual control, for instance, if it has discretionary authority over the account 9 ]! In general, the focus remains on whether the recommendation. SeeNotice to 04-89. Than six creates a presumption that the broker did not originally recommend liquefied home equity ) permits them recommend! Model that it uses is consistent with generally accepted investment theory they have multiple investment objectives appear. Broker or dealer discussing liquefied home equity ) a security or investment strategy '' is to be capable explaining. Private placements a purchase or an exchange for a discretionary account are implicitly recommended ) mean. 1361, 1369 n.9 ( 7th Cir will apply in more limited circumstances with regard to institutional than! Accepted investment theory be interpreted `` broadly only if a customer in FINRA rule 2111 is composed three... 15 ) ], Regulatory Notice 10-22 ( discussing liquefied home equity ) customers margin., Rules, and quantitative suitability likely will apply in more limited circumstances with regard to customers! On documentation of the test a purchase or an exchange for a given client subaccount tasks. View their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks or memoranda to supervisors or emails or to. Perform other compliance tasks requirements under the predecessor suitability rule as well FINRA notes that There are SEC and FINRA! Neutrals can view case information and submit documents through this Dispute Resolution....